Abstract Fatty meat from cattle finished for nine weeks on ryegrass/clover or maize was evaluated for intensity of pastoral odour and flavour by a sensory panel. Although there was no significant treatment effect for intensity, panellists' comments indicated that even this short period on a maize diet could change descriptions of odour and flavour; when assessed by independent assessors, the pasture treatment had a much lower ratio of "favourable" to "unfavourable" comments (P < 0.01). Odorous compounds in fat from the two treatments were examined by odourport sniffing, where compounds eluting from a gas chromatographic column were described, and identified where possible. Two "sniffers" semiquantitatively evaluated the fat volatiles, first trapped on Tenax then resolved on a column. Comparisons between treatments were largely unproductive. However, particularly odorous compounds were tentatively identified along with others of interest with respect to dietary origins. Compounds included 4-heptenal (and/or the coeluant heptanal), 1-octen-3-ol, nonanal, 2,6-nonadienal, nonanoic acid, and the faecal-smelling compound indole. 4-Methylphenol was not detected by sniffing but was present in the fat headspace. The chemical origins of these compounds are discussed in relation to diet.
Keywords beef; pasture; maize; pastoral odour; pastoral flavour; odourport; fat; linolenic acid; 4-heptenal; 1-octen-3-ol; 2,6-nonadienal; phenols; skatole
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 1999, Vol. 42: 297-304
0028-8233/99/4203-0297 $7.00/0 (c) The Royal Society of New Zealand 1999
PDF file of entire paper: medium quality (680K); (scanned from paper original: notes about this process)