Abstract Endophyte-infected (E+) tall fescue plants are usually more persistent under water deficit than endophyte-free plants (E–). The reason for this is still unclear because of conflicting reports about growth and water status variables. A glasshouse experiment was carried out to compare morpho-physiological responses of E+ and E– tall fescue plants to water deficit during a cycle of water deprivation and recovery. Under non-limiting conditions total dry mass per container was higher in E+ plants than in E– plants. However, no differences were found between endophyte treatments in root:shoot ratio, water status or in reducing sugar content of leaf blades or tiller bases. Under water limiting conditions an accelerated response to water deficit was observed in E+ plants. The relatively steeper growth cessation as well as higher leaf and root senescence in E+ than in E– were linked with a higher accumulation of sugars within the stem base of E+ plants which also tended to show a more pronounced decrease in water potential. Under water limiting conditions relative root:shoot ratio tended to decrease in E+ while remaining unchanged in E–. Following re-irrigation, a general recovery in growth and water status variables was observed. A simple explanation is proposed to reconcile our results with previous reports, although further research is needed.
Keywords tall fescue; Festuca arundinacea; fungal endophyte; Neotyphodium coenophialum; water deficit
A06008; Online publication date
0028–8233/06/4904–0359 © The Royal Society of New Zealand 2006
PDF file of entire paper: Print-quality (763K) | screen-quality (532K)