Our review of the putative effects of agricultural intensification on biodiversity in New Zealand (Moller et al. 2008) has been firmly and constructively criticised by Lee et al. (2008, this issue) in this forum on biodiversity and sustainability of New Zealand agriculture. Here we respond to their interventions in order to clarify and extend our original comments because we think that much of apparent disagreement stems from focus on different social-ecological scales, because Lee et al. (2008) have confused intensification with extensification, and because we think that further and vigorous debate will help identify ways of supporting both biodiversity and sustainable farming. Equally, we cannot accept a blanket assertion by Rowarth (2008, this issue) in this forum that agricultural intensification always protects global biodiversity. Instead, we argue for case-by-case and scale-dependent tests of the putative impacts of agricultural intensification on biodiversity in particular and sustainability of New Zealand farming in general
1
The Forum section contains short opinion articles on topics within the scope of the New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. Forum articles are not refereed, and editing is limited to style matters. They should be no more than the equivalent of 2500 words including references. Articles commenting on a specific paper will be referred to the author(s) of that paper for right of reply before publication. Forum articles should not be cited as scientific papers.A08065; Online publication date 30 October 2008
Received 24 October 2008
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 2008, Vol. 51
:461–465PDF file of entire paper: Print-quality (638K)
This year's abstracts | Journal home page | All abstracts | Publishing home page