Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand abstracts
Macrofossils and pollen representing forests of the pre-Taupo volcanic
eruption (c. 1850 yr BP) era at Pureora and Benneydale, central
North Island, New Zealand
Beverley R. Clarkson1, Matthew S. McGlone2,
David J. Lowe3, Bruce D. Clarkson4
Micro- and macrofossil data from the remains of forests overwhelmed and buried
at Pureora and Benneydale during the Taupo eruption (c.
1850
conventional radiocarbon yr BP) were compared. Classification of relative
abundance data separated the techniques, rather than the locations, because the
two primary clusters comprised pollen and litter/wood. This indicates that the
pollen:litter/wood within-site comparisons (Pureora and Benneydale are
20 km apart) are not reliable. Plant macrofossils represented mainly local
vegetation, while pollen assemblages represented a combination of local and
regional vegetation. However, using ranked abundance and presence/absence data,
both macrofossils and pollen at Pureora and Benneydale indicated
conifer/broadleaved forest, of similar forest type and species composition at
each site. This suggests that the forests destroyed by the eruption were
typical of mid-altitude west Taupo forests, and that either data set (pollen or
macrofossils) would have been adequate for regional forest interpretation.
The representation of c. 1850 yr BP pollen from the known
buried forest taxa was generally consistent with trends determined by modern
comparisons between pollen and their source vegetation, but with a few
exceptions.
A pollen profile from between the Mamaku Tephra (c. 7250 yr BP)
and the Taupo Ignimbrite indicated that the Benneydale forest had been markedly
different in species dominance compared with the forest that was destroyed
during the Taupo eruption. These differences probably reflect changes in
drainage, and improvements in climate and/or soil fertility over the middle
Holocene.
Keywords: macrofossil, litter, wood, buried forest, classification,
Taupo Ignimbrite, Mamaku Tephra, pollen profile
(c) Journal of The Royal Society of New Zealand,
Volume 25, Number 2, June 1995, pp 263-281
PDF file of entire paper: medium quality (1882K); (scanned from paper original: notes about this process)
This year's abstracts |
Journal home page |
All abstracts |
Publishing home page