New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research abstracts
Should sequential designs be used for comparative experiments
on animals?
P. D. JOHNSTONE
Invermay Agricultural Centre
Private Bag 50034
Mosgiel, New Zealand
Abstract There has been some recent interest in sequential
experiments as a means of reducing the number of animals used in comparative
experiments. This paper describes sequential methods and explores their
properties. Comparisons are made with fixed sample-sized experimental designs
which result from traditional power calculations. Attention is drawn to
potential problems in interpreting and managing sequential experiments and it
is concluded that fixed sample-size experimental designs are still justified on
both ethical and financial grounds for comparative experiments, particularly
when estimates of the size of the response and their standard errors are
important.
Keywords sequential experiments; Sequential Probability Ratio
Tests; SPRT; comparative experiments; animal ethics
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 1998, Vol. 41: 561-566
0028-8233/98/4104-0561 $7.00/0 (c) The Royal Society of New Zealand
1998
PDF file of entire paper: medium quality (379K); (scanned from paper original: notes about this process)
This year's abstracts |
Journal home page |
All abstracts |
Publishing home page