New Zealand Journal of Botany abstracts
Viability and longevity of pollen of Nothofagus species in south
Chile
Paola Báez
Magaly Riveros*
Carlos Lehnebach
Instituto de Botánica
Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad Austral de Chile
Casilla 567
Valdivia, Chile
*Author for correspondence. Email: mrivero@uach.cl
Abstract The reproductive success of some Nothofagus
species from South Chile is poor. Although self-incompatibility is known
to occur, seed set by out-crossing pollination is still low. Therefore, in
this study we focused on the pollen physiology of these species. Using direct
and indirect methods, the viability and longevity of pollen grains from young
and mature individuals of the species N. antarctica, N. obliqua,
N. dombeyi, and N. betuloides were assessed. Pollen germination
in vivo was evaluated in hand-pollinated and naturally pollinated receptive
stigmas of both categories. To assess pollen viability indirectly, in vitro
germination on a sucrose-agar culture medium was performed. Alexander’s procedure
(an indirect method) was used to evaluate viability immediately after pollen
collection and longevity after 3, 6, and 12 months of storage. Pollen germination
in vivo ranged from 52 to 74% in young individuals and 68 to 84% in mature
trees. In vitro germination ranged from 46 to 71% in young individuals and
49 to 85% in mature trees. Fresh pollen dyed with Alexander’s stain reached
91-100% viability. Similar values were obtained after three months of storage.
After 6 months, pollen viability reduced to 66% and after one year of storage,
viability had dropped to 21 to 50%, with mature individuals showing the highest
loss of viability. The relevance of these findings to breeding programmes
and pollination studies is discussed.
Keywords pollen; pollen longevity; viability; in vivo
germination; Nothofagus; Chile
B01035 Received 18 July 2001; accepted 2 July 2002; published 28 November
2002
New Zealand Journal of Botany, 2002, Vol. 40: 671-678
0028-825X/02/4004-0671 $7.00 © The Royal Society of New Zealand
2002
PDF file of entire paper: Print-quality (402K) |
screen-quality (148K)
This year's abstracts |
Journal home page |
All abstracts |
Publishing home page