Home page Top menu bar
   
191 pixel spacer

New Zealand Journal of Botany abstracts


Survey of potential sapstain fungi on Pinus radiata in New Zealand

Joanne M. Thwaites
Roberta L. Farrell*
Shona M. Duncan
Stephan D. Reay

Department of Biological Sciences
University of Waikato
Private Bag 3105
Hamilton, New Zealand

Robert A. Blanchette

Department of Plant Pathology
University of Minnesota
St Paul
Minnesota, 55108, USA

Esther Hadar
Yitzhak Hadar

Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Rehovot, Israel

Thomas C. Harrington
Douglas McNew

Department of Plant Pathology
Iowa State University
Ames
Iowa, 50010, USA

*Author for correspondence.
r.farrell@waikato.ac.nz

Abstract  A nationwide survey of New Zealand sapstain fungi on Pinus radiata was undertaken between 1996 and 1998 with collections of 1958 samples of material from 869 sites in the North and South Islands. Material was collected from mills, ports, forest plantations of native, exotic, or P. radiata, nurseries, farms, and urban areas. Material collected included branches, twigs, needles or leaves, cones, logs, wood chips, timber, and veneer. From these collections, 2154 potential sapstain fungi, representing 14 known species plus a number of unidentified species, were isolated. The predominant sapstain fungi isolated were Sphaeropsis sapinea, Ophiostoma ips, O. floccosum, O. piliferum, Leptographium procerum, and O. querci. S. sapinea was isolated from all material sampled including collections from the forest floor (including branches, twigs, needles, leaves, cones, and logs) as well as from logs and timber. In contrast Ophiostoma species were mainly found on logs, timber, and wood chips.

Keywords  Sphaeropsis sapinea; Ophiostoma; Pesotum; Sporothrix; Leptographium; Pinus radiata; sapstain

B04043; Received 27 October 2004; accepted 13 June 2005; Online publication date 21 July 2005
New Zealand Journal of Botany, 2005, Vol. 43: 653–663
0028–825X/05/4303–0653 © The Royal Society of New Zealand 2005

PDF file of entire paper: Print-quality (321K) | screen-quality (507K)


This year's abstracts | Journal home page | All abstracts | Publishing home page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advisory | Awards | Directory | Education | Events| Funding | Members | News | Publishing | Shop | Topics | Policy |

Problems with the site? Contact the webmaster