New Zealand Journal of Botany abstracts
Competitive abilities among seedlings of three tree species
differing in seed size: a garden experiment using species of Chilean
temperate forest
Paulina Chacón
Alejandro A. Muñoz*
Departamento de Botánica
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas
Universidad de Concepción
Casilla 160-C
Concepción, Chile
*deceased
Abstract Evidence suggests that seedlings of large-seeded
species have an initial size advantage but also tend to have slower
relative growth rates (RGR). In a 1-yr garden experiment in southern
Chile, we address whether early size advantages or disadvantages shown
by 3-month-old seedlings of three tree species differing markedly in
seed size (Persea lingue > Peumus boldus > Drimys
winteri) confer them with greater or lesser competitive abilities
when grown in species mixtures in the following 12 months of
development. Given the reported negative relationship between seed size
and RGR, we predicted a negative relationship between seed size and
competitive ability among these three species (i.e., D. winteri
> P. boldus > P. lingue). Seedlings of D.
winteri, the species producing the smallest seeds, had clear and
strong negative effects on the growth of seedlings of both P. boldus
and P. lingue. Likewise, P. boldus, the species
producing medium-sized seeds, had strong negative effects on the growth
of seedlings of the other two species. In addition, negative effects of
D. winteri on P. boldus were generally greater than vice
versa. Seedlings of P. lingue did not affect the growth of the
other two species. Therefore, our results support the predicted
hierarchy of competitive abilities, i.e., D. winteri > P.
boldus > P. lingue.
Keywords competitive ability; final shoot length; plant
interspecific competition; relative growth rate; seed size
B07011; Online publication date 27 November 2007; Received 20 April
2007; accepted 15 November 2007
New Zealand Journal of Botany, 2007, Vol. 45: 593–603
0028–825X/07/4504–0593 © The Royal Society of New Zealand 2007
PDF file of entire paper: Print-quality
(934K) | screen-quality (655K)
This year's abstracts |
Journal home page |
All abstracts |
Publishing home page