Home page Top menu bar
   
191 pixel spacer

New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science abstracts


Consumer perceptions of fruit production technologies

NICOLA RICHARDSON-HARMAN*
TRACEY PHELPS
PAULENE MOONEY
ROD BALL

The Horticulture and Food Research
 Institute of New Zealand Ltd
Private Bag 92 169
Auckland, New Zealand

*Present address: 122 Summit Hall Road, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20877, United States.

email: nharman@aol.com

Abstract  New Zealand consumer perceptions of risks and benefits of fruit production technologies were measured using a self-completion questionnaire survey. The fruit production methods tested included genetic engineering, chemical fertilisers, chemical pesticides, organic farming, and irradiation. The 511 respondents varied in age and locality (rural and city). In general, there was much consistency in the perceptions held by respondents; the benefits of genetic engineering in fruit production were perceived to outweigh the risks to both consumers and the environment but the use of both pesticides and irradiation in fruit production were considered to be unacceptably risky techniques with few associated benefits.

Keywords  consumer; fruit; transgenic; pesticide; irradiation; fertiliser; breeding; organic

H98003
Received 20 January 1998; accepted 13 May 1998

PDF file of entire paper: medium quality (927K); (scanned from paper original: notes about this process)


This year's abstracts | Journal home page | All abstracts | Publishing home page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advisory | Awards | Directory | Education | Events| Funding | Members | News | Publishing | Shop | Topics | Policy |

Problems with the site? Contact the webmaster