Close & Rosen--National survey of pesticides in groundwater

New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research abstracts

1998/99 national survey of pesticides in groundwater using GCMS and ELISA

MURRAY E. CLOSE

Institute of Environmental Science
& Research Ltd
P. O. Box 29 181
Christchurch, New Zealand
email: murray.close@esr.cri.nz

MICHAEL R. ROSEN

Wairakei Research Centre
Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Ltd
Private Bag 2000
Taupo, New Zealand
email: m.rosen@gns.cri.nz

Abstract A total of 95 wells throughout New Zealand were sampled during summer 1998/99 and analysed for a range of pesticides using gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GCMS). Thirty-three wells (35%) had pesticides including triazine metabolites detected, with 18 wells (19%) having two or more pesticides detected. Only one well (K38/0172) had pesticides detected at levels greater than the maximum acceptable value (MAV) for drinking water. There were 20 different pesticides detected, usually at very low concentrations, as well as two triazine metabolites. Fifty-seven out of the 75 pesticide detections (76%) belonged to the triazine group, with only five of these (9%) being >1 mg m^-3 and 74% of these being <0.1 mg m^-3. Three of the 18 non-triazine pesticide detections (17%) were >1 mg m^-3 with all three detections being in Well K38/0172. About half (44%) of the non-triazine pesticides were <0.1 mg m^-3. Apart from Well K38/0172, the highest levels of pesticides with respect to the MAV were seen for simazine and terbuthylazine, which were 16 and 44% of the MAV, respectively, with the remaining pesticides all below 4% of their MAV. This indicates that, although there were very low levels of pesticides present in 35% of the wells, there would be no significant health risk based on the pesticides analysed from drinking the groundwater investigated with the exception of Well K38/0172. There was a significant decrease in the detection limits for many pesticides for the 1998/99 survey compared to the two earlier surveys. When the detection limits for the earlier surveys were applied to the present survey there would have been a total of 10 wells out of the 95 sampled (11%) with pesticides detected. This compared with 7% of the 82 wells in 1990 and 13.6% of the 116 wells in 1994 with detectable pesticides, indicating that a similar percentage of wells have had detectable pesticides in each survey once correction for variable detection limits has been made. There was a significant difference between wells with and without pesticide detections for the following factors: wells with pesticide detections had shallower well screens, were screened nearer the water table, had lower pH values and higher nitrate levels. Samples for analysis using two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) atrazine test kits were collected at the same time as the other pesticide samples. The "normal" atrazine ELISA test kit only showed four positive detections, mainly because of a relatively high detection limit. The high sensitivity (HS) atrazine test kits detected pesticides in 20 of the 28 samples that were tested. Nineteen of the 20 detections had pesticide detections using GCMS, with the other eight samples having no pesticides detected using GCMS. The HS atrazine ELISA test kit appears to be a useful indicator of pesticide contamination for New Zealand groundwater systems at a relatively low level of detection. All the positive GCMS results that were tested gave positive test kit results and there was only one potential false positive result. This is probably because the majority of pesticides detected in groundwater in New Zealand are triazines, and the HS atrazine kit has cross reactivity with most triazines and related pesticides.

Keywords pesticide; groundwater; ELISA; New Zealand

M00044

Received 3 July 2000; accepted 25 October 2000

New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 2001, Vol. 35: 205-219

0028-8330/01/3502-0205 $7.00 (c) The Royal Society of New Zealand 2001

PDF file of entire paper: medium quality (1125K); (scanned from paper original: notes about this process)

This year's abstracts | Journal home page | All abstracts | Publishing home page