Abstract We review ways of individually identifying stoats (Mustela erminea) and similar small mammals from visits to bait stations or to monitoring devices in the field. Tracking devices are the cheapest and most practical method currently available of measuring the presence of a particular species, but there has been little research on the recognition of individuals. Elongation of tracking tunnels, or using sooty plates rather than ink to record prints, may improve detectability of individual markings. Recording visits to bait stations or tracking tunnels from DNA sequencing of hair or skin samples is likely to be prohibitively expensive for many monitoring programmes. Identification of stoats visiting bait stations or tracking tunnels using electronic devices has great potential, but these techniques are impracticably expensive because stoats move over such large areas that individual receivers and data loggers would be needed for each bait station. Chemical bait markers such as rhodamine B may be the most suitable method for identifying which animals have used a particular bait station.
Keywords marking; tracking; footprints; genetic markers; PITs; radio tracking; stoats; Mustela erminea
Z03036; Received 15 September 2003; accepted 9 February 2004; online publication date 23 August 2004
New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 2004, Vol. 31: 193203
03014223/04/31030193 © The Royal Society of New Zealand 2004
PDF file of entire paper: Print-quality (583K) | screen-quality (358K)